3DMAX vs MIBR

IEM Cologne 2025 Stage 1

Match Ended

BO3

Past Matches

3DMAX
Jul 18
TYLOO

0 - 2

Jul 17
paiN

2 - 0

Jul 16
Rare Atom

2 - 0

Jul 15
Lynn Vision

0 - 2

Jun 14
paiN

0 - 2

MIBR
Jul 17
Astralis

0 - 2

Jul 16
Virtus.pro

2 - 0

Jul 15
Astralis

0 - 2

Jun 10
FaZe

0 - 2

Jun 09
Falcons

2 - 1

Match Prediction

Team Form & Rankings

3DMAX (≈ #15 world) enter IEM Cologne Stage 1 as bookmakers' favorites, boasting two Bo3 wins in recent LAN play (against paiN, Rare Atom) and a team rating around 1.13 over the past three months :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}.

MIBR (≈ #19 world) are underdogs with mixed form—just one Bo3 win in their last five LAN matches and no significant recent victories :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}.

Head-to-head: 3DMAX lead the series 2–1 over the last year and hold a 4–1 map advantage, including two straight 2–0 wins at Katowice and Cluj-Napoca :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}.

Edge: Clearly favors 3DMAX thanks to higher ranking, recent LAN consistency, and psychological advantage.

Map Pool Insights

3DMAX show map versatility—Dust2 (57%), Ancient (50%), Mirage (60%) in recent Bo3s—making them flexible in veto :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}.

MIBR are weak on most maps—they’ve not played Dust2, show just 29% win on Nuke and 50% on Anubis, with a concerning 14% on Ancient—and often ban Dust2 :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}.

Map advantage: Heavily with 3DMAX due to deeper pool and statistical confidence.

Individual & Tactical Factors

3DMAX’s lineup—bodyy, Lucky, Maka, Ex3rcice, Graviti—maintains strong synergy and disciplined mid-round structure, with consistent LAN impact :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}.

MIBR’s core (insani, exit, saffee, brnz4n, nicks) offers solid individual skill but lacks cohesion and consistent low-pressure results :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}.

Tactically, 3DMAX rely on structured utility use and defaults, while MIBR lean on aggression that falters under structured pressure.

Tactical Scenarios & Prediction

Map 1 (3DMAX pick – likely Mirage or Dust2): Expect disciplined CT halves and mid-round reads—**13–9 3DMAX**.

Map 2 (MIBR pick – possibly Nuke or Ancient): MIBR may contest early, but veto depth favors 3DMAX—**13–11 3DMAX**.

Map 3 (decider – e.g., Anubis): 3DMAX’s flexibility and adaptation should seal the series—**13–8 3DMAX**.

Summary

3DMAX bring ranking advantage, LAN Bo3 form, and superior map pool control.

MIBR have individual talent but lack structural depth and recent series momentum.

Expect 3DMAX to control pace, force key rounds with utility and synergy, and close with authority.

AI Predicted score

3DMAX 2–0 MIBR

Match Comments

Leave a first comment