TPuDCATb TPu vs QMISTRY

Team Form & Rankings

TPuDCATb TPu sit around #61 globally, showcasing strong performances in recent Swiss rounds with wins over K27 and FAVBET, but also losses to larger teams like ex‑SABRE and INSILIO

QMISTRY, currently ranked around #138, have an inconsistent run with 2 wins in their last 5 matches and an unknown head-to-head record with TPu

Community sentiment and odds lean heavily toward TPu, with QMISTRY rarely favored

Individual & Tactical Factors

TPu stars: KIRO delivered 43 kills on Train (+18 differential), 27 kills on Ancient (+15) rating 1.71; executor also performed well (1.36)

QMISTRY's top was virtuoso with 42/30 on Train (1.36 rating), but consistent underperformance from keis, Fugor, Masi, and Xydoo (ratings between 0.77–0.93)hltv.org+5

TPu’s synergistic CT-side setups, mid-round aggression, and map control translated into overcoming QMISTRY’s attempts at adaptation.

Tactical Scenarios & Prediction

Scenario A: TPu’s Train pick Expected TP-side control, early bomb plants, disciplined defense. If TPu wins pistol and first gun rounds, they establish dominance. Actual score: 13–11 TPu.

Scenario B: QMISTRY picks Ancient TPu withstands initial push and peaks in late rounds—score: 13–10. TPu displayed clutch utility usage and coordinated retakes in decisive rounds.

Mirage decider (if played): Favours TPu, though their edge less pronounced. QMISTRY likely unable to adjust fully after two close losses.

Summary

TPuDCATb TPu advantages: Higher world ranking. Strong map control and tactical flexibility. Two high-impact performers (KIRO, executor).

QMISTRY disadvantages: Lower form, weaker map pool. Single standout but lacking broader depth.

TPu controlled mid-round pace, established round edges, and denied QMISTRY critical bombsite opportunities.

AI Predicted score

TPuDCATb TPu 2–0 QMISTRY